CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC E820
vs BenQ DC P860

Archive illustration for BenQ DC E820

BenQ / 2007

DC E820

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC P860

BenQ / 2007

DC P860

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC E820
38 mm²
DC P860
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
13 mm²
Relative difference
52.6%

The DC P860 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC E820MetricDC P860
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.76 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight182 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC P860 has the larger sensor area. The DC E820 has the lighter body. The DC E820 and DC P860 have the same effective resolution. The DC E820 and DC P860 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC E820

Released in 2007, DC E820 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC P860

Released in 2007, DC P860 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 182 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras