Reasons to choose DC C62
Released in 2004, DC C62 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.37 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
BenQ DC C62
vs BenQ DC E30
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
DC C6231 mm²
DC E30- Area ratio
- 1.23:1
- Absolute difference
- 7 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.4%
The DC C62 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DC C62MetricDC E30
6.37 MPEffective pixels3.14 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor6.4 × 4.8
2.44 µmPixel pitch3.13 µm
5.95 µm²Pixel area9.78 µm²
16.81 MP/cm²Pixel density10.22 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
168 gWeight82 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AAA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC C62 has the larger sensor area. The DC E30 has the lighter body. The DC C62 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C62 and DC E30 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC E30
Released in 2004, DC E30 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.