CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C1430
vs BenQ GH700

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C1430

BenQ / 2011

DC C1430

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ GH700

BenQ / 2011

GH700

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC C1430
28 mm²
GH700
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C1430 and GH700 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C1430MetricGH700
14 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight370 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C1430 and GH700 have the same sensor area. The DC C1430 has the lighter body. The GH700 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C1430 and GH700 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C1430

Released in 2011, DC C1430 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose GH700

Released in 2011, GH700 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 370 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras