CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C1060
vs BenQ DC T800

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C1060

BenQ / 2008

DC C1060

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC T800

BenQ / 2007

DC T800

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC C1060
27 mm²
DC T800
Area ratio
1.04:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
4.4%

The DC C1060 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC C1060MetricDC T800
10 MPEffective pixels8 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.03 × 4.52
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.85 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area3.41 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density29.35 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.74
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight120 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C1060 has the larger sensor area. The DC T800 has the lighter body. The DC C1060 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C1060 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C1060

Released in 2008, DC C1060 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC T800

Released in 2007, DC T800 has about 27 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras