Reasons to choose Optima 103
Released in 2010, Optima 103 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Optima 103
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 105
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Optima 10328 mm²
Optima 105- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Optima 103 and Optima 105 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Optima 103MetricOptima 105
12 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
100 gWeight105 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Optima 103 and Optima 105 have the same sensor area. The Optima 103 has the lighter body. The Optima 105 has the higher effective resolution. The Optima 103 and Optima 105 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Optima 105
Released in 2010, Optima 105 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.