Reasons to choose Optima 103
Released in 2010, Optima 103 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Optima 103
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 104
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Optima 10328 mm²
Optima 104- Area ratio
- 1.03:1
- Absolute difference
- 1 mm²
- Relative difference
- 2.6%
The Optima 103 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Optima 103MetricOptima 104
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
100 gWeight100 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Optima 103 has the larger sensor area. The Optima 103 and Optima 104 have the same body weight. The Optima 103 and Optima 104 have the same effective resolution. The Optima 103 and Optima 104 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Optima 104
Released in 2010, Optima 104 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.