CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

AgfaPhoto Optima 1
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 104

Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto Optima 1

AgfaPhoto / 2009

Optima 1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto Optima 104

AgfaPhoto / 2010

Optima 104

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Optima 1
28 mm²
Optima 104
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Optima 1 and Optima 104 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Optima 1MetricOptima 104
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight100 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Optima 1 and Optima 104 have the same sensor area. The Optima 1 has the lighter body. The Optima 1 and Optima 104 have the same effective resolution. The Optima 104 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Optima 1

Released in 2009, Optima 1 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Optima 104

Released in 2010, Optima 104 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras