CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Yakumo Mega Image II
vs Yakumo Mega Image VI

Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image II

Yakumo / 2002

Mega Image II

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image VI

Yakumo / 2003

Mega Image VI

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Mega Image II
38 mm²
Mega Image VI
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Mega Image II and Mega Image VI have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Mega Image IIMetricMega Image VI
2.1 MPEffective pixels3 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.25 µmPixel pitch3.55 µm
18.05 µm²Pixel area12.63 µm²
5.54 MP/cm²Pixel density7.92 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
148 gWeight138 g
CompactFlash type IStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Mega Image II and Mega Image VI have the same sensor area. The Mega Image VI has the lighter body. The Mega Image VI has the higher effective resolution. The Mega Image VI is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Mega Image II

Released in 2002, Mega Image II has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 148 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mega Image VI

Released in 2003, Mega Image VI has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3 MP effective resolution, and a 138 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras