CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Yakumo Mega Image II
vs Yakumo Mega Image IV

Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image II

Yakumo / 2002

Mega Image II

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image IV

Yakumo / 2002

Mega Image IV

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Mega Image II
38 mm²
Mega Image IV
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Mega Image II and Mega Image IV have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Mega Image IIMetricMega Image IV
2.1 MPEffective pixels2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.25 µmPixel pitch4.35 µm
18.05 µm²Pixel area18.95 µm²
5.54 MP/cm²Pixel density5.28 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
148 gWeight120 g
CompactFlash type IStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Mega Image II and Mega Image IV have the same sensor area. The Mega Image IV has the lighter body. The Mega Image II has the higher effective resolution. The Mega Image II and Mega Image IV were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Mega Image II

Released in 2002, Mega Image II has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 148 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mega Image IV

Released in 2002, Mega Image IV has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras