CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Yakumo Mega Image 410
vs Yakumo Mega Image XL

Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image 410

Yakumo / 2005

Mega Image 410

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image XL

Yakumo / 2005

Mega Image XL

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Mega Image 410
13 mm²
Mega Image XL
Area ratio
1.85:1
Absolute difference
11 mm²
Relative difference
85.2%

The Mega Image 410 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Mega Image 410MetricMega Image XL
4.1 MPEffective pixels5.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor4.23 × 3.17
2.46 µmPixel pitch1.62 µm
6.06 µm²Pixel area2.63 µm²
16.51 MP/cm²Pixel density38.03 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor8.19
—Maximum video—
270 gWeight140 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AAABattery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Mega Image 410 has the larger sensor area. The Mega Image XL has the lighter body. The Mega Image XL has the higher effective resolution. The Mega Image 410 and Mega Image XL were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Mega Image 410

Released in 2005, Mega Image 410 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 270 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mega Image XL

Released in 2005, Mega Image XL has about 13 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras