CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Yakumo Mega Image 35
vs Yakumo Mega Image IV

Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image 35

Yakumo / 2003

Mega Image 35

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image IV

Yakumo / 2002

Mega Image IV

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Mega Image 35
38 mm²
Mega Image IV
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Mega Image 35 and Mega Image IV have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Mega Image 35MetricMega Image IV
3.3 MPEffective pixels2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.39 µmPixel pitch4.35 µm
11.48 µm²Pixel area18.95 µm²
8.71 MP/cm²Pixel density5.28 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
245 gWeight120 g
CompactFlash type IStorageSecure Digital
4x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Mega Image 35 and Mega Image IV have the same sensor area. The Mega Image IV has the lighter body. The Mega Image 35 has the higher effective resolution. The Mega Image 35 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Mega Image 35

Released in 2003, Mega Image 35 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.3 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mega Image IV

Released in 2002, Mega Image IV has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras