CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Yakumo Mega Image 34
vs Yakumo Mega Image 37

Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image 34

Yakumo / 2003

Mega Image 34

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image 37

Yakumo / 2003

Mega Image 37

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Mega Image 34
25 mm²
Mega Image 37
Area ratio
1.17:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
16.5%

The Mega Image 37 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Mega Image 34MetricMega Image 37
3.1 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.62 µmPixel pitch2.46 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area6.06 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density16.51 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
190 gWeight185 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Mega Image 37 has the larger sensor area. The Mega Image 37 has the lighter body. The Mega Image 37 has the higher effective resolution. The Mega Image 34 and Mega Image 37 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Mega Image 34

Released in 2003, Mega Image 34 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mega Image 37

Released in 2003, Mega Image 37 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras