CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Yakumo CamMaster SD 432
vs Yakumo Mega Image XL

Archive illustration for Yakumo CamMaster SD 432

Yakumo / 2004

CamMaster SD 432

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image XL

Yakumo / 2005

Mega Image XL

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
CamMaster SD 432
13 mm²
Mega Image XL
Area ratio
1.59:1
Absolute difference
8 mm²
Relative difference
59%

The CamMaster SD 432 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

CamMaster SD 432MetricMega Image XL
3.2 MPEffective pixels5.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor4.23 × 3.17
2.58 µmPixel pitch1.62 µm
6.66 µm²Pixel area2.63 µm²
15.01 MP/cm²Pixel density38.03 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor8.19
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight140 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABattery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CamMaster SD 432 has the larger sensor area. The Mega Image XL has the lighter body. The Mega Image XL has the higher effective resolution. The Mega Image XL is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CamMaster SD 432

Released in 2004, CamMaster SD 432 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mega Image XL

Released in 2005, Mega Image XL has about 13 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras