CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Yakumo CamMaster SD 432
vs Yakumo Mega Image 84 D

Archive illustration for Yakumo CamMaster SD 432

Yakumo / 2004

CamMaster SD 432

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image 84 D

Yakumo / 2004

Mega Image 84 D

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
CamMaster SD 432
25 mm²
Mega Image 84 D
Area ratio
1.17:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
16.5%

The Mega Image 84 D has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

CamMaster SD 432MetricMega Image 84 D
3.2 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.58 µmPixel pitch2.49 µm
6.66 µm²Pixel area6.21 µm²
15.01 MP/cm²Pixel density16.1 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight534 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
4x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Mega Image 84 D has the larger sensor area. The CamMaster SD 432 has the lighter body. The Mega Image 84 D has the higher effective resolution. The CamMaster SD 432 and Mega Image 84 D were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CamMaster SD 432

Released in 2004, CamMaster SD 432 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mega Image 84 D

Released in 2004, Mega Image 84 D has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 534 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras