CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Yakumo CamMaster SD 432
vs Yakumo Mega Image 34

Archive illustration for Yakumo CamMaster SD 432

Yakumo / 2004

CamMaster SD 432

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Yakumo Mega Image 34

Yakumo / 2003

Mega Image 34

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
CamMaster SD 432
21 mm²
Mega Image 34
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CamMaster SD 432 and Mega Image 34 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

CamMaster SD 432MetricMega Image 34
3.2 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.58 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
6.66 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
15.01 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight190 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
4x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CamMaster SD 432 and Mega Image 34 have the same sensor area. The Mega Image 34 has the lighter body. The CamMaster SD 432 has the higher effective resolution. The CamMaster SD 432 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CamMaster SD 432

Released in 2004, CamMaster SD 432 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mega Image 34

Released in 2003, Mega Image 34 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras