CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Toshiba PDR 4300
vs Toshiba PDR 5300

Archive illustration for Toshiba PDR 4300

Toshiba / 2003

PDR 4300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Toshiba PDR 5300

Toshiba / 2003

PDR 5300

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
PDR 4300
38 mm²
PDR 5300
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PDR 4300 and PDR 5300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

PDR 4300MetricPDR 5300
4.2 MPEffective pixels5 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3 µmPixel pitch2.75 µm
9.02 µm²Pixel area7.58 µm²
11.08 MP/cm²Pixel density13.19 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
175 gWeight179 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PDR 4300 and PDR 5300 have the same sensor area. The PDR 4300 has the lighter body. The PDR 5300 has the higher effective resolution. The PDR 4300 and PDR 5300 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PDR 4300

Released in 2003, PDR 4300 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.2 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PDR 5300

Released in 2003, PDR 5300 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 179 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras