CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Toshiba PDR 3310
vs Toshiba PDR 4300

Archive illustration for Toshiba PDR 3310

Toshiba / 2002

PDR 3310

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Toshiba PDR 4300

Toshiba / 2003

PDR 4300

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
PDR 3310
38 mm²
PDR 4300
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PDR 3310 and PDR 4300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PDR 3310MetricPDR 4300
3.34 MPEffective pixels4.2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.37 µmPixel pitch3 µm
11.35 µm²Pixel area9.02 µm²
8.81 MP/cm²Pixel density11.08 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
205 gWeight175 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PDR 3310 and PDR 4300 have the same sensor area. The PDR 4300 has the lighter body. The PDR 4300 has the higher effective resolution. The PDR 4300 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PDR 3310

Released in 2002, PDR 3310 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 205 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PDR 4300

Released in 2003, PDR 4300 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.2 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras