CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Toshiba PDR 2300
vs Toshiba PDR M500

Archive illustration for Toshiba PDR 2300

Toshiba / 2002

PDR 2300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Toshiba PDR M500

Toshiba / 2003

PDR M500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
PDR 2300
21 mm²
PDR M500
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PDR 2300 and PDR M500 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PDR 2300MetricPDR M500
2 MPEffective pixels2 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.26 µmPixel pitch3.26 µm
10.66 µm²Pixel area10.66 µm²
9.38 MP/cm²Pixel density9.38 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
310 gWeight298 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
4x AABattery2x CR-V3, 4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PDR 2300 and PDR M500 have the same sensor area. The PDR M500 has the lighter body. The PDR 2300 and PDR M500 have the same effective resolution. The PDR M500 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PDR 2300

Released in 2002, PDR 2300 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 310 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PDR M500

Released in 2003, PDR M500 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 298 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras