CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sony Mavica FD-85
vs Sony Mavica FD-88

Archive illustration for Sony Mavica FD-85

Sony / 2000

Mavica FD-85

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sony Mavica FD-88

Sony / 1999

Mavica FD-88

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Mavica FD-85
17 mm²
Mavica FD-88
Area ratio
1.23:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
23.4%

The Mavica FD-85 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Mavica FD-85MetricMavica FD-88
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor4.8 × 3.6
4.22 µmPixel pitch3.79 µm
17.77 µm²Pixel area14.4 µm²
5.63 MP/cm²Pixel density6.94 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
482 gWeight600 g
Disk 3.5", MemoryStick via adapterStorageDisk 3.5" (4x speed)
InfoLithium (NP-F330)BatteryInfoLithium (NP-F330)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Mavica FD-85 has the larger sensor area. The Mavica FD-85 has the lighter body. The Mavica FD-85 and Mavica FD-88 have the same effective resolution. The Mavica FD-85 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Mavica FD-85

Released in 2000, Mavica FD-85 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 482 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mavica FD-88

Released in 1999, Mavica FD-88 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 600 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras