CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sony Mavica CD250
vs Sony Mavica FD-85

Archive illustration for Sony Mavica CD250

Sony / 2002

Mavica CD250

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sony Mavica FD-85

Sony / 2000

Mavica FD-85

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Mavica CD250
21 mm²
Mavica FD-85
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Mavica CD250 and Mavica FD-85 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Mavica CD250MetricMavica FD-85
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.35 µmPixel pitch4.22 µm
11.22 µm²Pixel area17.77 µm²
8.91 MP/cm²Pixel density5.63 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
610 gWeight482 g
8cm CDR, 8cm CDRWStorageDisk 3.5", MemoryStick via adapter
InfoLithium (NP-FM50)BatteryInfoLithium (NP-F330)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Mavica CD250 and Mavica FD-85 have the same sensor area. The Mavica FD-85 has the lighter body. The Mavica CD250 has the higher effective resolution. The Mavica CD250 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Mavica CD250

Released in 2002, Mavica CD250 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 610 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mavica FD-85

Released in 2000, Mavica FD-85 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 482 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras