CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sony Mavica CD1000
vs Sony Mavica CD200

Archive illustration for Sony Mavica CD1000

Sony / 2000

Mavica CD1000

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sony Mavica CD200

Sony / 2001

Mavica CD200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Mavica CD1000
21 mm²
Mavica CD200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Mavica CD1000 and Mavica CD200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Mavica CD1000MetricMavica CD200
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.35 µmPixel pitch3.35 µm
11.22 µm²Pixel area11.22 µm²
8.91 MP/cm²Pixel density8.91 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
980 gWeight620 g
8cm CDRStorage8cm CDR, 8cm CDRW
InfoLithium (NP-F330)BatteryInfoLithium (NP-FM50)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Mavica CD1000 and Mavica CD200 have the same sensor area. The Mavica CD200 has the lighter body. The Mavica CD1000 and Mavica CD200 have the same effective resolution. The Mavica CD200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Mavica CD1000

Released in 2000, Mavica CD1000 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 980 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Mavica CD200

Released in 2001, Mavica CD200 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 620 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras