CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sigma DP2s
vs Sigma SD1

Archive illustration for Sigma DP2s

Sigma / 2010

DP2s

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sigma SD1

Sigma / 2010

SD1

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

286 mm²
DP2s
384 mm²
SD1
Area ratio
1.34:1
Absolute difference
98 mm²
Relative difference
34.4%

The SD1 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DP2sMetricSD1
4.7 MPEffective pixels15.4 MP
20.7 × 13.8Sensor24 × 16
7.8 µmPixel pitch4.99 µm
60.78 µm²Pixel area24.94 µm²
1.65 MP/cm²Pixel density4.01 MP/cm²
1.74Crop factor1.5
—Maximum video—
280 gWeight280 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageCompact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The SD1 has the larger sensor area. The DP2s and SD1 have the same body weight. The SD1 has the higher effective resolution. The DP2s and SD1 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DP2s

Released in 2010, DP2s has about 286 mm² of sensor area, 4.7 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SD1

Released in 2010, SD1 has about 384 mm² of sensor area, 15.4 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras