CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sigma DP2
vs Sigma SD14

Archive illustration for Sigma DP2

Sigma / 2008

DP2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sigma SD14

Sigma / 2006

SD14

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

286 mm²
DP2
286 mm²
SD14
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DP2 and SD14 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DP2MetricSD14
4.7 MPEffective pixels4.7 MP
20.7 × 13.8Sensor20.7 × 13.8
7.8 µmPixel pitch7.8 µm
60.78 µm²Pixel area60.78 µm²
1.65 MP/cm²Pixel density1.65 MP/cm²
1.74Crop factor1.74
—Maximum video—
280 gWeight750 g
MultiMedia, SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DP2 and SD14 have the same sensor area. The DP2 has the lighter body. The DP2 and SD14 have the same effective resolution. The DP2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DP2

Released in 2008, DP2 has about 286 mm² of sensor area, 4.7 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SD14

Released in 2006, SD14 has about 286 mm² of sensor area, 4.7 MP effective resolution, and a 750 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras