CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sigma DP2 Merrill
vs Sigma DP2x

Archive illustration for Sigma DP2 Merrill

Sigma / 2012

DP2 Merrill

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sigma DP2x

Sigma / 2011

DP2x

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

384 mm²
DP2 Merrill
286 mm²
DP2x
Area ratio
1.34:1
Absolute difference
98 mm²
Relative difference
34.4%

The DP2 Merrill has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DP2 MerrillMetricDP2x
15.4 MPEffective pixels4.7 MP
24 × 16Sensor20.7 × 13.8
4.99 µmPixel pitch7.8 µm
24.94 µm²Pixel area60.78 µm²
4.01 MP/cm²Pixel density1.65 MP/cm²
1.5Crop factor1.74
—Maximum video—
330 gWeight280 g
—StorageSDHC, Secure Digital
—BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DP2 Merrill has the larger sensor area. The DP2x has the lighter body. The DP2 Merrill has the higher effective resolution. The DP2 Merrill is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DP2 Merrill

Released in 2012, DP2 Merrill has about 384 mm² of sensor area, 15.4 MP effective resolution, and a 330 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DP2x

Released in 2011, DP2x has about 286 mm² of sensor area, 4.7 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras