CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sanyo VPC T1495
vs Sanyo VPC X1420

Archive illustration for Sanyo VPC T1495

Sanyo / 2010

VPC T1495

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sanyo VPC X1420

Sanyo / 2010

VPC X1420

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
VPC T1495
28 mm²
VPC X1420
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The VPC X1420 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

VPC T1495MetricVPC X1420
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
100 gWeight135 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The VPC X1420 has the larger sensor area. The VPC T1495 has the lighter body. The VPC T1495 and VPC X1420 have the same effective resolution. The VPC T1495 and VPC X1420 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose VPC T1495

Released in 2010, VPC T1495 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose VPC X1420

Released in 2010, VPC X1420 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras