CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Sanyo VPC E1403
vs Sanyo VPC T1495

Archive illustration for Sanyo VPC E1403

Sanyo / 2010

VPC E1403

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sanyo VPC T1495

Sanyo / 2010

VPC T1495

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
VPC E1403
28 mm²
VPC T1495
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The VPC E1403 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

VPC E1403MetricVPC T1495
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density50.5 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
105 gWeight100 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The VPC E1403 has the larger sensor area. The VPC T1495 has the lighter body. The VPC E1403 and VPC T1495 have the same effective resolution. The VPC E1403 and VPC T1495 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose VPC E1403

Released in 2010, VPC E1403 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose VPC T1495

Released in 2010, VPC T1495 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras