CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung WB210
vs Samsung WB690

Archive illustration for Samsung WB210

Samsung / 2011

WB210

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB690

Samsung / 2011

WB690

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
WB210
28 mm²
WB690
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The WB210 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

WB210MetricWB690
14 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
174 gWeight160 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The WB210 has the larger sensor area. The WB690 has the lighter body. The WB210 has the higher effective resolution. The WB210 and WB690 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose WB210

Released in 2011, WB210 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 174 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB690

Released in 2011, WB690 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras