CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung WB1100F
vs Samsung WB50F

Archive illustration for Samsung WB1100F

Samsung / 2014

WB1100F

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB50F

Samsung / 2014

WB50F

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
WB1100F
28 mm²
WB50F
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The WB1100F and WB50F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

WB1100FMetricWB50F
16.2 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.76 µm²Pixel area1.76 µm²
56.92 MP/cm²Pixel density56.92 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,280 × 720Maximum video1,280 × 720
512 gWeight207 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageMicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Li-ion (SLB10A) Li-ion batteryBatteryBP70A

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The WB1100F and WB50F have the same sensor area. The WB50F has the lighter body. The WB1100F and WB50F have the same effective resolution. The WB1100F and WB50F were both released in 2014. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose WB1100F

Released in 2014, WB1100F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 512 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB50F

Released in 2014, WB50F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 207 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras