CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung TL320
vs Samsung WB750

Archive illustration for Samsung TL320

Samsung / 2009

TL320

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB750

Samsung / 2011

WB750

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
TL320
28 mm²
WB750
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The TL320 and WB750 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

TL320MetricWB750
12.2 MPEffective pixels12.5 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.51 µmPixel pitch1.49 µm
2.27 µm²Pixel area2.22 µm²
44 MP/cm²Pixel density45.09 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
168 gWeight194 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion SLB-10A rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-ion SLB-10A rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The TL320 and WB750 have the same sensor area. The TL320 has the lighter body. The WB750 has the higher effective resolution. The WB750 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose TL320

Released in 2009, TL320 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB750

Released in 2011, WB750 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.5 MP effective resolution, and a 194 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras