CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung ST96
vs Samsung TL500

Archive illustration for Samsung ST96

Samsung / 2011

ST96

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung TL500

Samsung / 2010

TL500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
ST96
42 mm²
TL500
Area ratio
1.49:1
Absolute difference
14 mm²
Relative difference
49.2%

The TL500 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

ST96MetricTL500
14.6 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor7.53 × 5.64
1.4 µmPixel pitch2.06 µm
1.95 µm²Pixel area4.25 µm²
51.3 MP/cm²Pixel density23.55 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight386 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion SLB-07A battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The TL500 has the larger sensor area. The ST96 has the lighter body. The ST96 has the higher effective resolution. The ST96 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose ST96

Released in 2011, ST96 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.6 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose TL500

Released in 2010, TL500 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 386 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras