Reasons to choose ST95
Released in 2011, ST95 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung ST95
vs Samsung WB210
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
ST9528 mm²
WB210- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The ST95 and WB210 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
ST95MetricWB210
16.1 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
1.77 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
56.57 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
121 gWeight174 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The ST95 and WB210 have the same sensor area. The ST95 has the lighter body. The ST95 has the higher effective resolution. The ST95 and WB210 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB210
Released in 2011, WB210 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 174 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.