CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung ST93
vs Samsung WB660

Archive illustration for Samsung ST93

Samsung / 2011

ST93

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB660

Samsung / 2010

WB660

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
ST93
28 mm²
WB660
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The ST93 and WB660 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

ST93MetricWB660
16.1 MPEffective pixels12.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.53 µm
1.77 µm²Pixel area2.33 µm²
56.57 MP/cm²Pixel density42.87 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
121 gWeight214 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I, SDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The ST93 and WB660 have the same sensor area. The ST93 has the lighter body. The ST93 has the higher effective resolution. The ST93 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose ST93

Released in 2011, ST93 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB660

Released in 2010, WB660 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 214 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras