CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung ST76
vs Samsung WB850F

Archive illustration for Samsung ST76

Samsung / 2012

ST76

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB850F

Samsung / 2012

WB850F

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
ST76
28 mm²
WB850F
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The ST76 and WB850F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

ST76MetricWB850F
16.1 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.77 µm²Pixel area1.76 µm²
56.57 MP/cm²Pixel density56.92 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
341 gWeight341 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion SLB-10A rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion SLB-10A rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The ST76 and WB850F have the same sensor area. The ST76 and WB850F have the same body weight. The WB850F has the higher effective resolution. The ST76 and WB850F were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose ST76

Released in 2012, ST76 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 341 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB850F

Released in 2012, WB850F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 341 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras