CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung ST72
vs Samsung WB2100

Archive illustration for Samsung ST72

Samsung / 2013

ST72

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB2100

Samsung / 2013

WB2100

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
ST72
28 mm²
WB2100
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The ST72 and WB2100 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

ST72MetricWB2100
16.2 MPEffective pixels16.38 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.32 µm
1.76 µm²Pixel area1.74 µm²
56.92 MP/cm²Pixel density57.56 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight533 g
microSD/microSDHCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Rechargeable battery BP70ABatterySLB-10A

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The ST72 and WB2100 have the same sensor area. The ST72 has the lighter body. The WB2100 has the higher effective resolution. The ST72 and WB2100 were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose ST72

Released in 2013, ST72 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB2100

Released in 2013, WB2100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.38 MP effective resolution, and a 533 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras