Reasons to choose ST66
Released in 2012, ST66 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 101 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung ST66
vs Samsung WB100
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
ST6628 mm²
WB100- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The ST66 and WB100 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
ST66MetricWB100
16.1 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.77 µm²Pixel area1.76 µm²
56.57 MP/cm²Pixel density56.92 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
101 gWeight408 g
microSD/microSDHCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBattery4×AA Type
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The ST66 and WB100 have the same sensor area. The ST66 has the lighter body. The WB100 has the higher effective resolution. The ST66 and WB100 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB100
Released in 2012, WB100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 408 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.