CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung ST6500
vs Samsung WB700

Archive illustration for Samsung ST6500

Samsung / 2011

ST6500

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB700

Samsung / 2010

WB700

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
ST6500
28 mm²
WB700
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The ST6500 and WB700 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

ST6500MetricWB700
16.1 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.31 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
1.72 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
58.07 MP/cm²Pixel density50.5 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
121 gWeight499 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion BP1310 battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The ST6500 and WB700 have the same sensor area. The ST6500 has the lighter body. The ST6500 has the higher effective resolution. The ST6500 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose ST6500

Released in 2011, ST6500 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB700

Released in 2010, WB700 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 499 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras