CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung ST150F
vs Samsung ST72

Archive illustration for Samsung ST150F

Samsung / 2013

ST150F

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST72

Samsung / 2013

ST72

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
ST150F
28 mm²
ST72
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The ST150F and ST72 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

ST150FMetricST72
16.2 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.76 µm²Pixel area1.76 µm²
56.92 MP/cm²Pixel density56.92 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight114 g
microSD/microSDHCStoragemicroSD/microSDHC
BP70ABatteryRechargeable battery BP70A

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The ST150F and ST72 have the same sensor area. The ST150F and ST72 have the same body weight. The ST150F and ST72 have the same effective resolution. The ST150F and ST72 were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose ST150F

Released in 2013, ST150F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST72

Released in 2013, ST72 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras