CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung SH100
vs Samsung ST90

Archive illustration for Samsung SH100

Samsung / 2011

SH100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST90

Samsung / 2011

ST90

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
SH100
28 mm²
ST90
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The ST90 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

SH100MetricST90
14 MPEffective pixels14.1 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.42 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area2.02 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density49.54 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
174 gWeight121 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The ST90 has the larger sensor area. The ST90 has the lighter body. The ST90 has the higher effective resolution. The SH100 and ST90 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose SH100

Released in 2011, SH100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 174 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST90

Released in 2011, ST90 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.1 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras