CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung SH100
vs Samsung SL102

Archive illustration for Samsung SH100

Samsung / 2011

SH100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung SL102

Samsung / 2009

SL102

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
SH100
28 mm²
SL102
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The SH100 and SL102 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

SH100MetricSL102
14 MPEffective pixels10.2 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.65 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area2.72 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density36.79 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
174 gWeight116 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
Lithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable (SLB-10A) Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The SH100 and SL102 have the same sensor area. The SL102 has the lighter body. The SH100 has the higher effective resolution. The SH100 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose SH100

Released in 2011, SH100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 174 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SL102

Released in 2009, SL102 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 116 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras