CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung S1060
vs Samsung TL350

Archive illustration for Samsung S1060

Samsung / 2008

S1060

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung TL350

Samsung / 2010

TL350

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
S1060
28 mm²
TL350
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The S1060 and TL350 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

S1060MetricTL350
10.2 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.65 µmPixel pitch1.67 µm
2.72 µm²Pixel area2.77 µm²
36.79 MP/cm²Pixel density36.07 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight195 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLithium-Ion SLB-11A battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The S1060 and TL350 have the same sensor area. The S1060 has the lighter body. The S1060 has the higher effective resolution. The TL350 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose S1060

Released in 2008, S1060 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose TL350

Released in 2010, TL350 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 195 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras