CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung S1060
vs Samsung SL50

Archive illustration for Samsung S1060

Samsung / 2008

S1060

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung SL50

Samsung / 2010

SL50

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
S1060
28 mm²
SL50
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The S1060 and SL50 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

S1060MetricSL50
10.2 MPEffective pixels10.2 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.65 µmPixel pitch1.65 µm
2.72 µm²Pixel area2.72 µm²
36.79 MP/cm²Pixel density36.79 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The S1060 and SL50 have the same sensor area. The S1060 and SL50 have the same body weight. The S1060 and SL50 have the same effective resolution. The SL50 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose S1060

Released in 2008, S1060 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SL50

Released in 2010, SL50 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras