CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung PL65
vs Samsung WB750

Archive illustration for Samsung PL65

Samsung / 2009

PL65

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB750

Samsung / 2011

WB750

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
PL65
28 mm²
WB750
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PL65 and WB750 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PL65MetricWB750
12 MPEffective pixels12.5 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.49 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.22 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density45.09 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight194 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
—BatteryLithium-ion SLB-10A rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PL65 and WB750 have the same sensor area. The PL65 has the lighter body. The WB750 has the higher effective resolution. The WB750 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PL65

Released in 2009, PL65 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB750

Released in 2011, WB750 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.5 MP effective resolution, and a 194 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras