CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung PL51
vs Samsung WB210

Archive illustration for Samsung PL51

Samsung / 2009

PL51

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB210

Samsung / 2011

WB210

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
PL51
28 mm²
WB210
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PL51 and WB210 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PL51MetricWB210
10.3 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.66 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.76 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
36.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
116 gWeight174 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PL51 and WB210 have the same sensor area. The PL51 has the lighter body. The WB210 has the higher effective resolution. The WB210 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PL51

Released in 2009, PL51 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.3 MP effective resolution, and a 116 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB210

Released in 2011, WB210 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 174 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras