CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung PL210
vs Samsung ST96

Archive illustration for Samsung PL210

Samsung / 2011

PL210

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST96

Samsung / 2011

ST96

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
PL210
28 mm²
ST96
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PL210 and ST96 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

PL210MetricST96
14 MPEffective pixels14.6 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.4 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area1.95 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density51.3 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
174 gWeight110 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PL210 and ST96 have the same sensor area. The ST96 has the lighter body. The ST96 has the higher effective resolution. The PL210 and ST96 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PL210

Released in 2011, PL210 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 174 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST96

Released in 2011, ST96 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.6 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras