CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung PL160
vs Samsung PL170

Archive illustration for Samsung PL160

Samsung / 2010

PL160

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung PL170

Samsung / 2011

PL170

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
PL160
28 mm²
PL170
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PL160 and PL170 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PL160MetricPL170
16.1 MPEffective pixels16.1 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.31 µmPixel pitch1.31 µm
1.72 µm²Pixel area1.72 µm²
58.07 MP/cm²Pixel density58.07 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight87 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PL160 and PL170 have the same sensor area. The PL160 has the lighter body. The PL160 and PL170 have the same effective resolution. The PL170 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PL160

Released in 2010, PL160 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PL170

Released in 2011, PL170 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 87 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras