CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung NX1
vs Samsung NX3000

Archive illustration for Samsung NX1

Samsung / 2014

NX1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung NX3000

Samsung / 2014

NX3000

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

369 mm²
NX1
369 mm²
NX3000
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The NX1 and NX3000 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

NX1MetricNX3000
28.2 MPEffective pixels20.3 MP
23.5 × 15.7Sensor23.5 × 15.7
3.62 µmPixel pitch4.26 µm
13.08 µm²Pixel area18.17 µm²
7.64 MP/cm²Pixel density5.5 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
4,096 × 2,160Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
550 gWeight230 g
SD/SDHC/SDXC/UHS-I/UHS-IIStoragemicroSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
BP-1900BatteryRechargeable battery B740

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The NX1 and NX3000 have the same sensor area. The NX3000 has the lighter body. The NX1 has the higher effective resolution. The NX1 and NX3000 were both released in 2014. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose NX1

Released in 2014, NX1 has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 28.2 MP effective resolution, and a 550 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose NX3000

Released in 2014, NX3000 has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 20.3 MP effective resolution, and a 230 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras