CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung NV9
vs Samsung ST60

Archive illustration for Samsung NV9

Samsung / 2008

NV9

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST60

Samsung / 2010

ST60

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
NV9
28 mm²
ST60
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The NV9 and ST60 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

NV9MetricST60
10.2 MPEffective pixels12.4 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.67 µmPixel pitch1.51 µm
2.79 µm²Pixel area2.3 µm²
35.84 MP/cm²Pixel density43.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight121 g
MultiMedia, SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable (SLB-0837B) Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The NV9 and ST60 have the same sensor area. The ST60 has the lighter body. The ST60 has the higher effective resolution. The ST60 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose NV9

Released in 2008, NV9 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST60

Released in 2010, ST60 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.4 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras