CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung M100
vs Samsung ST6500

Archive illustration for Samsung M100

Samsung / 2011

M100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung ST6500

Samsung / 2011

ST6500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
M100
28 mm²
ST6500
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
3 mm²
Relative difference
11.6%

The ST6500 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

M100MetricST6500
8.2 MPEffective pixels16.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.74 µmPixel pitch1.31 µm
3.03 µm²Pixel area1.72 µm²
33.01 MP/cm²Pixel density58.07 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight121 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The ST6500 has the larger sensor area. The M100 has the lighter body. The ST6500 has the higher effective resolution. The M100 and ST6500 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose M100

Released in 2011, M100 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8.2 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose ST6500

Released in 2011, ST6500 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 121 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras