CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung L80
vs Samsung WB5500

Archive illustration for Samsung L80

Samsung / 2008

L80

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung WB5500

Samsung / 2010

WB5500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
L80
28 mm²
WB5500
Area ratio
1.33:1
Absolute difference
9 mm²
Relative difference
33.2%

The L80 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

L80MetricWB5500
8.4 MPEffective pixels13.8 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor6.16 × 4.62
2.12 µmPixel pitch1.44 µm
4.51 µm²Pixel area2.06 µm²
22.17 MP/cm²Pixel density48.49 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
153 gWeight455 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion SLB-11A rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The L80 has the larger sensor area. The L80 has the lighter body. The WB5500 has the higher effective resolution. The WB5500 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose L80

Released in 2008, L80 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.4 MP effective resolution, and a 153 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose WB5500

Released in 2010, WB5500 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 13.8 MP effective resolution, and a 455 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras