CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Samsung L200
vs Samsung TL350

Archive illustration for Samsung L200

Samsung / 2008

L200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung TL350

Samsung / 2010

TL350

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
L200
28 mm²
TL350
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
3 mm²
Relative difference
11.6%

The TL350 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

L200MetricTL350
10.2 MPEffective pixels10 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.56 µmPixel pitch1.67 µm
2.44 µm²Pixel area2.77 µm²
41.06 MP/cm²Pixel density36.07 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight195 g
MultiMedia, SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion SLB-11A battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The TL350 has the larger sensor area. The L200 has the lighter body. The L200 has the higher effective resolution. The TL350 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose L200

Released in 2008, L200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose TL350

Released in 2010, TL350 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 195 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras